Mandating ‘laser guns’

The Times Union (Albany, New York) editorial board is, not surprisingly, enthusiastically in support of dragging New York down the contemptible path blazed by California, and requiring that handguns “microstamp” their serial numbers on the fired cartridge cases. Like many other “authorized journalists,” though, their knowledge of the issues at hand is . . . more than a little shaky. Get this:

At issue is a bill in the Legislature that, if enacted into law, would require handguns sold in New York to be equipped with a laser capable of etching a gun’s serial number on the firing pin or chamber, thereby marking each cartridge as it fires.

The handgun is to be equipped with a laser?! One powerful enough to etch legible characters on brass, and do so in the fraction of a second between the firing of a gun and the ejection of the cartridge case? Wow–the miniaturization of lasers (not to mention their power sources) has certainly come a great deal farther along than I had realized.

Gun advocates are already raising a host of “what if” objections to microstamping, such as “what if” criminals were to leave microstamped casings from another gun at a crime scene to confuse police. But Sen. Golden, a former New York City police officer, says that possibility exists even now, when police try to match casings in ballistic tests. And yet, he says, it rarely happens.

Here’s another “what if” for you. “What if” the nefarious shooter replaces the firing pin with one that does not have the “microstamping,” and defaces the characters stamped into the chamber walls (assuming that we’re talking about the kind of technology being mandated in California, and not futuristic, tiny, powerful lasers)? I’m not at all mechanically inclined, but even I have swapped out firing pins in a matter of minutes, and defacing microscopic engraving isn’t exactly a technically demanding challenge.

Opponents also claim that microstamping will add hundreds of dollars to the cost of a handgun. Supporters say it would be more like $1. Opponents say that microstamping would be useless in tracing stolen guns, or those smuggled in from other states. Supporters say that if New York were to join with California in enacting microstamping legislation, that would set a model for other states, and Congress, to follow.

Yeah–because the rest of the nation has a long history of following along with California’s and New York’s citizen disarmament policies.

Supporters have the better arguments all around, just as Sen. Moynihan had the better argument on bullet control years ago.

And the Times Union editorial board has certainly demonstrated the expertise to have the authority to render a judgment on who has the better argument–their minds are obviously in laser-sharp focus.

UPDATE: Guess I wasn’t the first to catch this. Nice work, Robb.

Advertisements

8 Responses to “Mandating ‘laser guns’”

  1. Yuri Orlov Says:

    Damn! Let’s just skip the bullets and make laser guns instead. I mean, if it’s powerful and small enough to engrave the serial number on the firing pin, why not just use the laser? 🙂

  2. Smershagent Says:

    I’ll take the phased plasma rifle, in the 40-watt range, please.

  3. David Codrea Says:

    I took a screenshot just in case they revise the text without issuing a correction. Let me know if you need it.

    Although why I would doubt their ethical standards is beyond me.

  4. 45superman Says:

    Thanks, David–I should have thought of that.

  5. opaww Says:

    Can I have my micro stamp as a smiley face with the words Have a Nice Day on it?

    By the way, I posted a link to your Blog on my new web site, the old one was taken down when Freespaces decided to not provide free web hosting anymore.

  6. Bruce W. Krafft Says:

    I already made this suggestion over at David’s blog (WarOnGuns.blogspot.com) but I think it bears repeating. If this legislation will only add $1 to the cost of each gun, then put that in the bill.

    The manufacturer of this proprietary equipment has to go to any gun manufacturer in the world who requests it, install and set up the etching equipment, train local personnel on how to use it, maintain and repair it in perpetuity, and in return the gun manufacturer will pay them $1 for each gun that gets etched.

  7. Don Gwinn Says:

    Pew, pew!

  8. Less Says:

    Don’t forget that the microstamping also includes the # on the breech face and the extractor…

    That said, slides and extractors aren’t FFL’d items… yet!

    Then again, sand paper works well too…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: